Angie King
Ms. Taylor
APLAC
Period 1
“The Silence of the
Lambs”- A Killer Classic
Silence of
Lambs is a horror film that cannot be denied the title of “classic film”. A
classic movie does not go unnoticed. “The
Silence of the Lambs”, produced by Jonathan Demme in 1991, changed the way that
people thought about humans in our society.
A classic movie obviously has high standards. Without these standards, ordinary movies
could not be distinguished from extraordinary movies, like “The Silence of the
Lambs”.
A classic movie has
a clear requirement of outstanding acting and directing. However, a classic film is not dependent on
having famous Hollywood stars. Sometimes
being in a film that becomes a classic will make a new Hollywood star. It is the way the plot and characters are
crafted that determines if the production was successful or not. The actors and actresses of classic films
must have clear qualities that separate them from the rest. Actress Jodie Foster, actor Anthony Hopkins
and actor Ted Levine certainly had these qualities in this classic. Jodie Foster, as Clarice Starling, had undeniable
passion in her character. The training FBI
agent was persistent in her attempts of stopping the murderer Buffalo Bill. She adapted to this fearless agent when her
character went through various dangerous situations to attain her goal. This passion played an important factor in
Hopkins’ character as well. Anthony
Hopkins, as Dr. Hannibal Lecter, had to adapt to a sick yet genius mind of a cannibal. His character was obsessed with Foster’s
character. His beady eyes and intimate
personality create a creepy but critical aspect to this movie. The other sociopath in this movie, Buffalo
Bill, was played by actor Ted Levine.
Levine had to become a mentally ill, murderous, transvestite for his
part. These three unique characters take
unique abilities of the actors who play them sufficiently. Director Jonathan Demme creates an
unforgettable horror film and utilizes these extraordinary actors and actresses
to their full potential. These successful efforts of creating a classic did not
go unnoticed either.
The popularity for this film goes well beyond my opinion as
well as critics’ like Roger Ebert.
Although awards, nominations and titles that films are given do not
define it, they are a clear indication of society’s general feelings about the
film. Jodie Foster,
who acted as Clarice Starling, and Anthony
Hopkins, who acted as Dr. Hannibal Lecter, won Oscars for best
actress and actor. This film won for best picture, for Demme’s direction and
Ted Talley's screenplay, and was also nominated for editing and sound. “The
Silence of the Lambs” was clearly one of a kind that it could not be ignored by
the Oscars. A respected and idolized
award such as an Oscar clearly indicates that it has, and possibly will always
have, an effect on its audience.
If a film has a
lasting effect on society, you can be sure it is considered a classic. The intended audience must be affected in
some distinct way. “The Silence of the
Lambs” surely accomplished this prerequisite of being a classic. This film was the first look that took America
into the sick criminal minds of people.
Since the movie was based on a true story, it gave Americans a glimpse
of the reality of the link between crime and mentally ill people. One of the main characters, Dr. Hannibal Lecter,
is a severely ill psychiatrist who ate his patients as well as other people. There’s no surprise that his nickname was “Hannibal
the Cannibal.” Lecter suffered from various
mental illnesses and committed murder, assault and other crimes in his lifetime. Another psychotic character, known as Buffalo
Bill, kidnapped and killed women in order to make a suit for himself made out
of their skin. These scenarios are
brutal and certainly are out of the ordinary.
But this classic made it real to the audience. This movie
exposed society to the truth behind these heinous crimes and offenders. A sense of horror and fear was instilled into
moviegoers with the realization that this type of monster existed. Robert Ebert, a well-known critic from the
Chicago Sun Times agreed that “The Silence of the Lambs” not only involves “cannibalism and the
skinning of people, but also kidnapping, being trapped in the bottom of a well,
decomposing corpses, large insects, being lost in the dark, being tracked by
someone you cannot see, not being able to get people to believe you, creatures
who jump from the shadows, people who know your deepest secrets, doors that
slam shut behind you, beheadings, [and] bizarre sexual perversions…” This nauseating film undoubtedly shook the
film’s viewers for quite some time. Although
disturbing, a peculiar draw to this film created much admiration for its
production and presentation of this tale into something the average American
could understand. The popularity of this
film has been consistent since its debut in 1991. “The Silence of the Lambs” is considered to
be similar to other horrors such as "Nosferatu,"
"Psycho"
and "Halloween,"
which are evidence that the best thrillers don't age. Fear is a universal and timeless emotion. “The
Silence of the Lambs” is not solely a thriller though; it focuses on
characters, their relationships, and their development throughout the plot.
This film includes
two of the most memorable characters in movie history, Clarice Starling and
Hannibal Lecter. These characters’
strange and dysfunctional relationship was exemplified throughout the film. Lecter has an obsession with Starling, an FBI
trainee, when he claims that “people will say we're in love” to Starling. This relationship is developed in the movie
as Starling gradually receives clues from Lecter about Buffalo Bills’ unknown
identity. An element of suspense or draw
as a movie develops also determines if it should be considered a classic or
not. Demme’s film does exactly that. This
suspense was seen throughout the FBI investigation of Buffalo Bill as well as how
Starling and Lecter’s twisted relationship developed. Pieces of the plot slowly form together,
creating a dynamic and twisted ending that is truly unforgettable.
If you haven’t already seen the classic “The Silence of the
Lambs”, go discover why this film has changed views of society. Aren’t you wondering why the lambs stopped
screaming?
WORKS CITED
IMBd.com,
“The Silence of the Lambs,” Accessed on February 10, 2012.
RogerEbert.com,
“The Silence of the Lambs,” Accessed on February 11, 2012.
I think the way you organized your evaluation was really good because it made it clear to the reader at the beginning of each paragraph exactly what element of the film you were going to be evaluating. I also think you did a great job incorporating both logos and pathos into your evaluation- the logos with the awards the film won and the pathos with how the characters made the audience scared. I also like how you refrained from spoiling the ending and that you finished with a question that leads readers to want to go watch the movie for themselves.
ReplyDeleteI think that the way you explained the immense detail of the scenes in the movie was a great way to capture the reader's attention, it definitely grabbed mine. I also though that when you explained how each character acted and why, you improved your evaluation because you were explaining to the reader why the director chose these characters. This helped you to display the meaning of the movie; to uncover the criminal minds of some humans. By incorporating another experts opinion and comparing the movie to the likes of others, you established a clear ethos to the audience. Also, your fluency from paragraph to paragraph was easy to read and follow along.
ReplyDelete